V32 Racing Forum

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
V32 Racing Forum -> Rules and Regs for 2009 -> Proposed - 60s/70s Le Mans
Post Info TOPIC: Proposed - 60s/70s Le Mans
aastes


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 217
Date:
Proposed - 60s/70s Le Mans
Permalink  

  1. Any brand Box stock cars with Class specific mods listed below.
    (Excluding Slotter, Slot-it & Racer cars) (18k motor limit)
  2. Ninco spring guide (Not Pro-Race Guides) - may have spring removed
  3. Wheel/Tyre combination may be replaced with other hubs from within the class or Alloy wheels with correct style insert
  4. Replacement spur gear of same dimensions/teeth number as per original
  5. Chassis Trimming/shaving to a maximum of 1mm along each side


-- Edited by aastes at 15:04, 2008-10-29

-- Edited by aastes at 21:39, 2008-10-29

__________________
gref


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Date:
Permalink  

aastes wrote:

  1. Any brand Box stock cars with Class specific mods listed below.
    (Excluding Slotter, Slot-it & Racer cars) (18k motor limit)
  2. Solid front axle
  3. Ninco spring guide (Not Pro-Race Guides) - may have spring removed
  4. Wheel/Tyre combination may be replaced with other hubs from within the class or Alloy wheels with correct style insert
  5. Replacement spur gear of same dimensions/teeth number as per original
  6. Chassis Trimming/shaving to a maximum of 1mm along each side


-- Edited by aastes at 15:04, 2008-10-29
looks good!



__________________
Rob


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 167
Date:
Permalink  

Add replacement stub axles - ie bushed and drill blanks as per this year.

__________________
Cheers
Rob

Remember RULE #1 - HAVE FUN
Shane Lott


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 111
Date:
Permalink  

Agree with these with the addition of Rob re bush & blank (almost sounds rude!) biggrin

Shane L

__________________
All I wanna do is race and have laughs like Rob!
sax0607


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink  

bush and blank me !!!

the solid front axle has been a standard rule in this class for the past 18 month , maybe it just been over looked in this draught.


sax

__________________
aastes


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 217
Date:
Permalink  

sax0607 wrote:

bush and blank me !!!

the solid front axle has been a standard rule in this class for the past 18 month , maybe it just been over looked in this draught.


sax


Its in the generic rules



__________________
mtpanorama


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 158
Date:
Permalink  

With these cars now allowed alloy hubs and replacement spur gears why would we excluded the Slotter, Slot it and Racer cars. With the 18K motor limit in the rules these cars would be no quicker than the Flys.

__________________
Scrivo


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink  

I don't understand why we can't use other brand's anyway, and all this about 18,000 motor limit is getting boring...
awww gee it revs to much lets put it back in the box fear.gif.. VARIETY..what ever happened to "run what you brung???"

When can i race my Slotit Alfa's?
Is this becoming a FLY,Ninco,Slotit club confused

Soprry for the rant..but i have car's i would like to race not look at..smile



__________________
I want that one and that one ,oh and that one...
gref


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Date:
Permalink  

Scrivo wrote:

I don't understand why we can't use other brand's anyway, and all this about 18,000 motor limit is getting boring...
awww gee it revs to much lets put it back in the box fear.gif.. VARIETY..what ever happened to "run what you brung???"

When can i race my Slotit Alfa's?
Is this becoming a FLY,Ninco,Slotit club confused

Soprry for the rant..but i have car's i would like to race not look at..smile



variety is good, I also have cars that only ever get a run here. point is, slot it will be a clear winner against all other rtr cars. I also have the Alfa's, but they are yet to get a run cry



__________________
mtpanorama


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 158
Date:
Permalink  

What if we run the Slot its with the pod tight, that should keep them more in line with the other cars.

__________________
Rob


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 167
Date:
Permalink  

Scrivo wrote:

 

I don't understand why we can't use other brand's anyway, and all this about 18,000 motor limit is getting boring...
awww gee it revs to much lets put it back in the box fear.gif.. VARIETY..what ever happened to "run what you brung???"

When can i race my Slotit Alfa's?
Is this becoming a FLY,Ninco,Slotit club confused

Soprry for the rant..but i have car's i would like to race not look at..smile

 


If Slot it was allowed to run how many Fly's would be in the field? or any other manufacturer for that matter? The class as it stands right now provides close racing why change it?


 



-- Edited by Rob at 19:15, 2008-11-09

-- Edited by Rob at 19:23, 2008-11-09

__________________
Cheers
Rob

Remember RULE #1 - HAVE FUN
gref


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Date:
Permalink  

Rob wrote:

Scrivo wrote:


I don't understand why we can't use other brand's anyway, and all this about 18,000 motor limit is getting boring...
awww gee it revs to much lets put it back in the box fear.gif.. VARIETY..what ever happened to "run what you brung???"

When can i race my Slotit Alfa's?
Is this becoming a FLY,Ninco,Slotit club confused

Soprry for the rant..but i have car's i would like to race not look at..smile



If Slot it was allowed to run how many Fly's would be in the field? or any other manufacturer for that matter? The class as it stands right now provides close racing why change it?





-- Edited by Rob at 19:15, 2008-11-09

-- Edited by Rob at 19:23, 2008-11-09
so true Rob, it would turn into an Alfa or Ferrari 312 class. That's for those who have them and those that don't probably wouldn't bother. We have been racing this class as is since 2006, and as Rob says it provides good close racing and there's plenty of variety on the grid



__________________
aastes


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 217
Date:
Permalink  

mtpanorama wrote:

What if we run the Slot its with the pod tight, that should keep them more in line with the other cars.


How tight is tight?



__________________
aastes


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 217
Date:
Permalink  

There is already a class for Slot Its where it can race with other Slot Its so there is no need to bugger up something that works.
 
Slot Its, Le Mans/LMP and classic Le Mans are three seperate classes

__________________
aastes


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 217
Date:
Permalink  

mtpanorama wrote:

With these cars now allowed alloy hubs and replacement spur gears why would we excluded the Slotter, Slot it and Racer cars. With the 18K motor limit in the rules these cars would be no quicker than the Flys.


Thats he reason I didnt want all these bolt on goodies allowed



__________________
mtpanorama


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 158
Date:
Permalink  

aastes wrote:

 

mtpanorama wrote:

With these cars now allowed alloy hubs and replacement spur gears why would we excluded the Slotter, Slot it and Racer cars. With the 18K motor limit in the rules these cars would be no quicker than the Flys.


Thats he reason I didnt want all these bolt on goodies allowed

 


Me either.  My understanding was that the other brands were excluded because some/all of the bolt on goodies come standard on these cars.


 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
V32 Racing Forum -> Rules and Regs for 2009 -> Proposed - 60s/70s Le Mans


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard